APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

2004/10/02 rebol


© October 2004 Tony Lawrence

Another odd little scripting language. I was particularly amused at the so called "FAQ" and this description:

It's a messaging language ` 'rebel' not 'ree-ball' ` code is data
and data is code ` CGI? Yes ` 40+ platforms ` only 250K-500K `
console or GUI ` Yes, just a single file ` commercial versions =
same core + ODBC, SSL, and more - shallow learning curve, amazing
depth ` keep IT simple ` if you liked "The Matrix"..
 

If code is data and data is code, you can keep it, thanks.

Then there was:

If you do text processing, it's great for that too; no reg-ex's,
but it has something better (the PARSE function)
 

No regexes?? Here's a page on PARSE: https://www.rebol.com/docs/words/wparse.html. That's better than regexes??? I don't think so, sorry..


Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> rebol

4 comments


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of iCloud, Fifth Edition

Are Your Bits Flipped?

Photos: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of OS X Server

iOS 10: A Take Control Crash Course




More Articles by © Tony Lawrence






Fri Mar 25 12:05:26 2005: 234   anonymous


172.138.25.170 (looks like spam)



Thu Dec 15 16:50:02 2005: 1440   anonymous


"I don't think so,"

Why not?



Thu Dec 15 18:16:54 2005: 1441   TonyLawrence

gravatar
Because it's nothing better, so why not use standards?



Sat Dec 17 03:23:21 2005: 1444   BigDumbDinosaur


Because it's nothing better, so why not use standards?

I fully agree with Tony's assessment.

I've often contended that some of these so-called languages originate because their authors can't comprehend what already is in widespread use. I recall that sort of thinking in a post elsewhere on this site to the effect that the getopt library function in C was nasty and crufty because it uses "hard coded externs." Because the poster, for reasons that elude me, apparently doesn't understand the logic behind getopt, a function that has been around since the days when computers were as big as a house, he dismisses it as useless.

Oftentimes, languages like rebol are so far off the mark they defy explanation. Plus the "code is data and data is code" mantra is a total turnoff to me. Look at the mess Windows is in because of this flawed form of thinking. I can't see any reason why any programmer worthy of the name would even consider this abortion.

Summing it up, "no thanks."

------------------------


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





Writing in C or C++ is like running a chain saw with all the safety guards removed. (Bob Gray)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Compiler

Misc.

Programming

UnixWords



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode





SCO Unix Sales, Support, & Service

Phone:  707-SCO-UNIX (707-726-8649Toll Free: 833-SCO-UNIX (833-726-8649)
www.SCOsales.com