APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Bada-bing - Microsoft busted and Google cleans up the Farms

© February 2011 Anthony Lawrence

Earlier this month we had Microsoft get caught with its hands in Google's Cookie jar. When some had suggested that Bing might be just scraping Google results to help their search results, Microsoft loudly decried "No we do not!". I'll quote from "Setting the record straight":

We do not copy results from any of our
competitors. Period. Full stop. We have some of
the best minds in the world at work on search
quality and relevance, and for a competitor to
accuse any one of these people of such activity
is just insulting.

Given that Google proved that Microsoft DOES copy Google results and that that blog actually admits it while still trying to deny it, it's amazing that they haven't just taken that nonsense down, but it is still there for you to read if you haven't yet.

Google did a "honeypot" attack. That is, they manually inserted fake results for gibberish searches, had some of their engineers try that gibberish at home, and, sure enough, a month later you could type that same gibberish into Bing and get the same fake results. Bada-bing, Microsoft, Bada-bing.

See the whole thing at Matt Cutts Blog. You don't really need to watch all of the video unless you like to hear pathetic excuses from someone caught red-handed stealing from their competitor.

Content Farms

However, it was this week that brought the real shocker. Right after announcing its Chrome search block plugin, Google stunned us by suddenly cracking down on content farms.

Honestly, I might not have even noticed if I hadn't been doing some writing at HubPages, which may or may not be one of the sites Googles new algorithm has targeted. I say "may or may not" because some writers there are screaming bloody blue murder because their earnings have dropped out of site, while others are shaking their heads and saying they see no problem at all.

Google may be fine tuning their algorithm. The folks screaming now may be smiling again come Tuesday or the folks who saw no change may wake up then to find they are diminished also. All that remains to be seen as i write this, but the important thing is that Google IS taking definite action to improve search results.

There is no doubt that Google will always be imperfect. Sometimes they will reward the undeserving and sometimes they will punish content that should have had top billing. Computer algorithms will do that. The important thing is that they are no longer ignoring the problem: they are taking action.

But do understand this: Google only cares if we care. The only reason they want quality results is so that you and I don't defect to Bing or Blekko or Wolfram. I have no illusions about that: this was triggered by inroads that other search engines are making and not by any purity of search ideals.

Still, I'm happy to see it. I don't know yet if it hurts or helps me, but that will be whatever it is. The action is right regardless.

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> Bada-Bing, microsoft, Bada-Bing!


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Sierra: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of iCloud

Photos: A Take Control Crash Course

iOS 10: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of IOS 11

More Articles by © Anthony Lawrence

Tue Mar 1 23:40:20 2011: 9346   anonymous


So what's your point? They (Microsoft) stole, yes. But Google stole from Oracle and way back in the day Apple stole from PARC.

Do you not understand the business world?

Wed Mar 2 01:00:50 2011: 9347   TonyLawrence


Exactly. And that should have been their response: yes, we watch what you do and factor it into our results.

But no, they denied it. "Period. Full stop". That's why they look like idiots (as usual).

Wed Mar 2 18:25:24 2011: 9349   anonymous


> But no, they denied it. "Period. Full stop". That's why they look like idiots (as usual).

Apple denied it, Google is currently denying they stole from Oracle. It has nothing to do with looking like or being idiots, it's about protecting the corporation's assets by trying not to get sued. Admitting fault opens up litigation possibilities. All companies do this (i.e. lie), Apple, Google, IBM, and yes, even companies that "support FOSS".

Either you don't understand the business world or you are yet another AnyoneButMicrosoft™ zealot who won't admit that all other businesses practice this sort of behavior. Full stop.

Wed Mar 2 18:28:50 2011: 9350   TonyLawrence


Sure. Whatever you say.


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

Why bother with subroutines when you can type fast? (Vaughn Rokosz)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode

SCO Unix Sales, Support, & Service

Phone:  707-SCO-UNIX (707-726-8649Toll Free: 833-SCO-UNIX (833-726-8649)