Google donated $350,000 to support open source development. In reference to that, Google's Chris DiBona is quoted as saying that "Backing open-source projects also puts pressure on Microsoft and other software companies".
We all know that Google uses Linux and other open source software for the humongous server farm that processes our searches. We all know that Microsoft probably wants to kill Google. We get it, Microsoft gets it, and Google gets it.
So why do all their platform products appear in Microsoft versions first and Linux or Mac versions later or never?
I understand that they HAVE to do Microsoft versions. I also understand that Linux versions can be more difficult because of all the different distros out there. Yes, the Mac and Linux market combined is still ridiculously small so from a straight product analysis, what they do makes sense. But it does not make sense politically.
Microsoft is Google's enemy. Not because Google has any reason to dislike them, but because Microsoft sees Google as a giant threat and therefore turns against them like a rabid dog. This 350K donation is a political move, but an even better political maneuver would be to put platform products out in Mac and Linux versions BEFORE the Microsoft versions. The Linux ports don't have to be all inclusive; it's the gesture that counts: Microsoft has to be second fiddle for a change. People coming to download the latest whiz-bang tool from Google would find a Mac version and perhaps one or two Linux downloads and a note saying to check back later for the Microsoft Windows tool. Post that a week later, and in the meantime you've got people wishing they had Linux or a Mac.
Got something to add? Send me email.
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence © 2009-11-07 Anthony Lawrence