APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

If I have to work for an idiot, I might as well work for
© December 1998 Tony Lawrence
myself- Tony Lawrence

There are no problems, only income opportunities- Tony Lawrence


Somebody once said "I've been rich and I've been poor, and rich is better". I feel that way about being self employed. I've been self-employed since 1977, and although I did take a few years here and there working as an employee, I wouldn't have it any other way.

It isn't all roses, of course. Nor is it necessarily the path to financial security, although I really do believe that you have far more security working for yourself than you do for anyone else. There are good things, there are not so good things.

When magazines run stories about self-employed people, they usually talk only about the great successes (the gal who started in her basement and now owns MegaComp, Inc.) or the failures (the guy who hocked everything he owned and went bankrupt). Those are the extreme. The real story of the self-employed is people quietly supporting themselves at about the same income level as their employed peers, working more or less as long, more or less as hard.

That's the reality: if you work for yourself, you might go bankrupt, or you might get wealthy, but chances are you'll just make the same sort of living you would doing it for someone else.

So why bother? Well, for one thing, there is that chance of making more money, maybe a lot more money. If that's your goal, you probably have a better chance of reaching it on your own than waiting to be promoted to CEO of IBM. That's especially true if your education has been more hard knocks than ivory tower: while people do get promoted on talent and merit, most of the people doing the promoting want to cover their bets by seeing diplomas attached to the experience. If you don't have that sheepskin, being your own boss makes it unimportant.

There's also freedom, and I really think that this is the most important benefit. I don't mean freedom to take vacations when you want or to work the schedule that you like, although those certainly are benefits. What I mean is freedom to control your own destiny.

The most unhappy, stressed out people are those who are responsible for results, but can't do anything to affect or control those results. That's even been shown in animal studies, and there has been some fuss in management circles about "empowerment" and the like with the idea of giving workers more power to make choices and control some aspects of their work environment, thereby making happier workers.

The happiest people, of course, are those who can control their environment. That's just natural; we like to make choices. Most people get to do that fully only in their personal lives. We understand that all those choices won't be the best, that some of them will turn out badly, but we still want to make them ourselves. We choose our own friends, we choose our favorite foods, we choose our own hobbies, and most of us wouldn't want it any other way.

In the workplace, however, no matter how "empowered" you are, most folks don't really get to make their own choices. Someone above you, often a faceless someone, is making decisions that can drastically affect your life, and you don't have much control at all.

Unless you work for yourself, of course. Then you have total control, and (of course) total responsibility.

That responsibility sometimes scares people. I know, I've been through it: I'm not good enough, I'm not smart enough, I don't know enough. I'll never make it. Consider this, though:

If you are good enough that someone else will employ you, you are good enough to work for yourself.

It just makes sense: your boss needs to you do a job. Obviously you are good enough so that boss was willing to hire you. If that's true, his customers (or other customers just like them) will be willing to "hire" you, too.

And that is where true security comes from. When you are an employee, your security comes from the opinions and needs of a handful of people, sometimes even just one person. If they decide that you aren't doing the job they want, or that their needs have changed, your security just disappears instantly. But if it comes from a dozen, a hundred, or a few thousand customers, then the loss of one who doesn't like you, or whose needs have just outgrown you, isn't important. Your income may drop a little this month, but it doesn't stop, and there is always a new customer just around the corner. That's real security.

In case you still think it's about money:

Some of us are entrepeneurial not for love of money or self, but because we don't like group-think and prefer to be independent.

I know that for many, many people, there doesn't seem to be any other choice but serfdom. You have bills to pay, children to care for, a lifestyle you don't want to lose. You trade your freedom for security.

At one time in human history, all of us were entrepeneurs in some sense. In another sense, of course, we were tied to small groups even more strongly than you are tied to your employer. Hard to say whether you are more or less free, but I am definitely MORE free than most people have been able to be at any time in human history.

I can't speak for others, but for me, the desire for freedom, the ability to pilot my own course, and the avoidance of petty strictures is why I am independently employed. It isn't an easy life always, but I realized early on that I couldn't improve it by enslaving other people (I know that seems like a very harsh word, but that is how I view most employment).

I did have daydreams about being successful enough where I could create a worker's utopia - where the people who worked for me would enjoy independence and freedom. Gosh what a lovely picture. I soon realized that can never be because those that COULD be part of such an environment are perfectly capable of creating it themselves and those who are not don't want it: they want the safety of someone else controlling their lives. That this "safety" is a false promise is obvious, yet people believe it.. but I'm rambling :-)

Anyway, not all of us are money-grubbing selfish bastards. Some of us are crazy libertarian wishful-utopian but practical realist bastards.

If you are self employed, you might also be interested in the Sohodojo and Free Agent Nation.

© December 1998 A.P. Lawrence. All rights reserved

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> Self Employment

Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

iOS 10: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of iCloud, Fifth Edition

Take Control of iCloud

Take Control of OS X Server

Take Control of Upgrading to El Capitan

More Articles by © Tony Lawrence

Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

Software and cathedrals are much the same – first we build them, then we pray. (Sam Redwine)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode