dashes vs. underscores in filenames

In the old days of the web, file names usually didn't go out of their way to convey information about their contents. If the page was about dogs, sure, it might have been "dogs.html", but if it was "Care and feeding of poodles", it was more likely to be "poodles.html" than anything else.

That's all changed. The conventional wisdom nowadays is that search engines pay attention to file names as part of their analysis, so that poodle page is probably "care-and-feeding-of-poodles.html" now.

That brings up a question, though: should it be "care-and-feeding-of-poodles.html" (dashes) or "care_and_feeding_of_poodles.html" (underscores)? A Google search for "dashes vs. underscores" will tell you that dashes are the smart choice, but I didn't find any place that tells you why.

One hint might be found in Perl regular expressions. If you use "/w" in a Perl expression, that matches alphanumeric characters plus "_". The "/w" is often used to break up sentences into words. So "hello-there" is two words if "/w" is used, but "hello_there" is only one. I'm not saying Google or any other search engine uses Perl to parse your pages (though they might), but Perl got the idea of "_" being part of a word from long established practice. So, if you want search engines to "see" separate words, you should probably use dashes.

There is another point to consider, though: "care-and-feeding-of-poodles.html" is a lot of typing, and although most passing of links is down by cut and paste rather than word of mouth, length and difficulty may be something to think about. I think I'd probably make that "poodle-care.html". There is also speculation that search engines may penalize you for too many dashes in a link because it starts looking like spam: "lets-cram-every-keyword-we-can-into-this-link.html".

So, use dashes and keep it shorter rather than longer.

Versatile Site Map Generator $59.00
A1 Sitemap Generator

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.