The meaningful security page is

A NewsForge article on security vulnerabilities reminds me of the old saying about "lies, damn lies, and statistics"

The NewsForge article points out that the really useful statistics are http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/ and http://www.us-cert.gov/current/. In fact, the "current" page is probably the best snapshot of what's important right now (and, as usual, Microsoft takes top honors).


Hate these ads?

Many vulnerabilities are extremely obscure or require conditions that really make them unlikely. Other security issues may be more likely for some than others: an exploit that requires a login might be dangerous in a large organization and completely unimportant in a three person office. Vulnerabilities in specific software (Symantec's recent Heap Buffer Overflows for example) only matter to you if you are running that software.

I want to step back and take a more general view for a moment and remind all of us that a door is usually more vulnerable than a wall.

I get asked about security a lot more than I used to. That's good; it shows that people are more aware and are at least thinking about it. Of course many of the people I'm likely to be talking to have multiple operating systems: Windows, Linux, maybe Mac or SCO Unix. They want to know "Are we safe?"

It's a legitimate question, and there's no easy answer. Safe from what? The outside world? Internal employees? Physical disasters?

Well, usually they mean the outside world. Hackers. Black Hats. Script Kiddies. Worms, Trojans and all that. Are we safe, dammit.

Earlier this week I was asked that in reference to a new Fedora install. Is it safe? Yeah, right this minute it's a lot safer than the Windows XP machines and certainly a heck of a lot safer than the Windows 98 machines that were still running there. But new exploits are discovered all the time, so the Linux box might not be "safe" next week.






But wait a minute. What's this Linux box used for? It's an app server. It's not even really connected to the Internet. That is, it can go out and get patches, and you could browse web pages from it, but nobody does. There's no direct path from the router/firewall to it. Effectively, it has no "doors".

Yet an XP machine near it is used as a "GotoMYPC" box. When that box isn't being used to provide access for remote support, somebody uses it for their ordinary day to day activities: browsing, email, and everything else. There's a a redirect in the firewall that shuffles "GotoMyPC" packets over to it. That's a door. In fact, it's several doors, and some of them are being thrown open all day long.

So what I said was that I'd be a lot more worried about the "GotoMyPC" than the Fedora Linux. Not that it's necessarily insecure right now, but it is an opening. It's not a wall, it's a door. People browse with it and read email. It has more exposure to exploits than the Linux box does. Therefore, you should watch its security very closely. You don't want to ignore the Linux, but frankly in this scenario, it's pretty darn "safe".

Security is a journey, not a destination. Unwanted visitors are more likely to come through doors (even if they have to pick the locks) than smash through walls. Doors that are shut are more secure than doors that get used all day long.


Technorati tags:

cartoon
Need eyes on the ground at your customer's site?
Installation and light training Boston and New England
Reliable and experienced, punctual and professional.


Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner





Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
2230453 1,924

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Security




Unix/Linux Consultants


UBB Computer Services Support for Openserver, Unixware and Linux. Windows integration with Unix/Linux servers. Hardware, Backup and Networking issues. Located near Sacramento CA, we provide onsite support throughout Northern CA and Nationwide via remote access. We are a SCO Authorized Partner and a Microlite BackupEdge Certified Reseller.


larryi@ccamedical.com SCO OS5, Debian Linux, RedHat Linux, MySQL, Apache, AJAX development using dXport/dL4/Unibasic, Windows Connectivity, Sharing Resouces, Automation, Shell Scripting


http://www.breakthru.com.au SCO (Openserver and Unixware), Unix, Solaris and Linux Consulting services including: Secure Networking Solutions; Linux based Firewalls; Backup Solutions; Secure Home to Office Network Setup; Phone, Remote and On-Site Support available - Satisfaction Guaranteed!



Twitter
  • Nov 23 08:34
    So many sites tell me what I MUST do: focus on a niche, have an elevator pitch, all that.. naaaw - I LIKE being scatter brained.
  • Nov 23 07:35
    Bailing out GM et al. is like bailing out SCO. It makes me angry that they even TALK about it.









Change Congress


Related Posts