Fri Jul 30 15:11:12 2004 Windows Isn't
Ready For The Desktop
Posted by BigDumbDinosaur
Search Keys: Linux, Windows, Desktop, Workstation
Referencing: http://thelinuxbox.org/Desktop.php
We often hear comments to the effect that "Linux is not ready for use on a workstation desktop." Well, in this amusing but factual article, author Sean Parsons turns the tables on Microsoft and asserts that it is Windows, not Linux, that isn't ready for the desktop.
More Articles by BigDumbDinosaur
/BDD/B1024.html copyright July 2004 BigDumbDinosaur All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
---July 30, 2004
As I've said before, no one who really *uses* a computer could possibly enjoy using Windows. Good articl; thanks for the link.
--TonyLawrence
---July 30, 2004
As I've said before, no one who really *uses* a computer could possibly enjoy using Windows. Good article; thanks for the link.
--TonyLawrence
---July 30, 2004
---July 30, 2004
As I've said before, no one who really *uses* a computer could possibly enjoy using Windows. Good article; thanks for the link.
--TonyLawrence
---July 30, 2004
One odd thing that people do is that when they talk about Linux on the desktop, They grade Linux using Windows as the ruler that they measure from.
One example is how they take a person that has been using MS Office apps in a professional enviroment for years, and then ask them to grade how easy it is to use.
Also you have much more subtler things that people do. MS has people brainwashed on how a computer operates. Windows ISN'T easy to use. The UI isn't slick and wonderfull. It isn't even that consistant, which is one major critism that Linux apps have. It's just that they've been using it for almost 10 years now and Windows is just what they are used too. (Mac OS X in comparision is actually easy to use.)
Then you have people that should know better that don't. Advanced users, or at least people that considure themselves advanced. They say things like how Linux should ditch the old Unix style directories (/etc/ /usr/ /lib/ and so on) which is SO confusing and that Linux needs to adapt a filing system that makes sense... Like Window's C: drive.
Which just boggles my mind how a person could feel that way.
--Drag
---July 30, 2004
As I've said before, no one who really *uses* a computer could possibly enjoy using Windows. Good article; thanks for the link.
--TonyLawrence
---July 30, 2004
One odd thing that people do is that when they talk about Linux on the desktop they grade Linux using Windows as the ruler.
One example is how they take a person that has been using MS Office apps in a professional enviroment for years, and then ask them to grade how easy it is to use.
Also you have much more subtler things that people do. MS has people brainwashed on how a computer operates. Windows ISN'T easy to use. The UI isn't slick and wonderfull. It isn't even that consistant, which is one major critism that Linux apps have. It's just that they've been using it for almost 10 years now and Windows is just what they are used too. (Mac OS X in comparision is actually easy to use.)
Then you have people that should know better that don't. Advanced users, or at least people that considure themselves advanced. They say things like how Linux should ditch the old Unix style directories (/etc/ /usr/ /lib/ and so on) which is SO confusing and that Linux needs to adapt a filing system that makes sense... Like Window's C: drive.
Which just boggles my mind how a person could feel that way.
--Drag
---July 31, 2004
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar